Journal On Rapoport :: essays research papers fc

Human had a long history of showing their go forth to shape, look into their surrounding and understanding the natural world. Thus, it is no surprise that valet had gone this far in advanced technology. By improving our acquisition and technology, we ar able to understand and research the world. This will allow military man to create more than stability thus avoiding some of the effects from undischarged fluctuations of nature forces explore the truth of myths. With this theme in mind, I uncovering it to be a very common characteristic among the three articles by Rapoport (Australian Aborigines And The Definition Of Place), Hertzberger (Lessons For Student In Architecture) and, Deyner (African Traditional Architecture), which could possibly explain the digression in the definition of place both by the author and the locale. It is non so much as the level of technology that these cultures exist in, only more relevantly, the period of technology improvement they are living in which defined their indigenous landscape architecture.Rapoport believes that Australian Aborigines, "cooperated with nature rather than to exceed it" (Rapoport, 1980p.44.) I found this to be a point that is somewhat undefiled but not precise. The fact that these Australian aborigines did not advance in technology, are forced to accept nature as it is. As a result, they live their lives primitively through myths and stories instead of research and development. This is evident when compared to Deyners article, explaining that the more advanced (this advancement is draw from the fact that these less nomadic Africans do trade and had farms) Africans developed more permanent dwells, practical buildings (huts) which created a clearer marches to identify their territory. However, the Africans minute building structures are still primitive and they are only constructed to serve a prime purpose like say, a small mud granary to store food. On the other hand, Hertzbergers "L esson for bookman in Architecture" dwell deeper into concept of space and how we divide and discourse building structures when he mentioned, "question of sensing the required distance and proximity between people ...purpose of space." (Hertzberger, 1991p.100)This level of division and detachment from natural dwelling showed a precise mentality of modern era human though I could not say that we are now in the twentieth century and do not appreciate or dislike nature. tho the point is that, modern era human had so much control and complex thought that enable us articulate our confinement (concept of space).