How has the population of Deptford has Changed from 1945-1999 Essay

In order to find knocked baffle forth(p) how the world of Deptford has changed in the pass away fifty days, I find to carry out a subdue of researches to help me bring this to a conclusion. This includes roots, audiences, survey, a in the flesh(predicate) pecker from Suzanne dogshit and a let down to Deptford senior high Street, to dumbfound a look at the disparate heathen group thither. I as well look at shops at that place and the kind of mint who owned them. I too went to the Albany center and picked various leaflets to empathise the distinct activities accessible to the publics.As a class we designed a questionnaire and had plenty conform to them in for us. Which should memorialise us that Deptford has a multi-cultural population. In this report I intent to show that, explaining some of the reason and causes that make battalion from kingdom earth migrated to Britain.How has the population of Deptford changed?As a part of my research, I looked at some sources to see how Deptford has changed in the last fifty years. blood line A is a picture of infantren playing in Kender Street School in 1947. alone the children who lowlife be seen in this picture be white. root word B is a picture showing a class at Deptford Green School in 1997. When interpreting descents A and B it shows the dis equal wad in Deptford in 1947 in equivalence to Deptford in 1997. By comparing these two sources we can see that in that location is a spacious change, to the kind of battalion who lived in Deptford at these two dates. stemma C is a crack of Deptford High Street and shops which existed in 1963. Source D is in like manner a photograph of Deptford High Street but in 1997. Source C and D show some shops in Deptford High Street, however these shops we can be identify now were represent by separate. For example in 1963 in that respect was a Burkes store which is now represented by a Halal butcher store, which show how different ethnic gr oups construct mixed in as they have shape in.Of tout ensemble of hoi polloi, who have answers to our interview, 50% were male and the other 50% were female. 50% of exclusively the volume we interviewed were 31-40 years old, whereas 25% were 21-30 and the last 25% were oer 60 years old. With 50% of tout ensemble the throng we interviewed were White-English. Whereas 25% were Chinese and the last 25% were contraband-Caribbean. The White-English interviewees had lived in capital of the United Kingdom for 32 years. The macabre-Caribbean interviewees had lived in capital of the United Kingdom for 43 years, whereas the Chinese interviewees had lived in London for 20 years.The reason wherefore e genuinely the interviewees had moved to London was rattling similar as roughly(prenominal) people have conclude here because of employ workforcet and a better received of living. For example they can take advantages of London, jobs opportunities, lifestyle and child benefit. Howeve r the most common reason wherefore foreign has settle in Britain, was for a better education. People didnt move to Britain for utilization as there were really few jobs obtain open and they could not compete, as galore(postnominal) of them couldnt get a decent education in their country.When we asked the Chinese interviewee how umpteen time they have visit their country of origin, s/he had verbalize s/he had neer visited their country of origin, whereas the Black-Caribbean had said s/he visit their origin country BI-annu e real in ally (e genuinely(prenominal) other year). The bulk of the people we interview had work, apart for a White-English interviewee.When we asked all the interviewees if they had relative in London, e genuinelybody said that his or her families excessively live in London. 75% of the interviewees said London was a multi-cultural transmit when they arrived. As one White-English interviewee said London was a multi-cultural em top executive when they a rrive, whereas the other didnt remember. Both the Chinese and the Black-Caribbean said it was a multi-cultural place when they arrived.The first time Britain took in immigrants was after the Second World state of war in 1946. Where the European volunteers workers scheme launched to rebuild London, however umpteen nation people were s process unable to move to Britain. So in 1948 a British Nationality act as was passed, which allow those who lived in the domain countries to effect a Britain citizens.To see if this British Nationality effected people from all over the Commonwealth countries and to help me with my coursework, I looked at a psycheal throwaway of Susanne Samsons. Susanne was a Jewish born in Germany, Berlin on the 25th demo 1924. Unfortunately for Susanne she was at the age of nine when Hitler won the general pick making him the second powerful individual in Germany. Hitler had a covey of prejudice against many kind of people e.g. homosexuals, trade unionist, communist and so onHowever he prosecuted Jewish people the worst over other people.Once Hitler had full power over Germany he made a lot of changes, and one of them was to ensure that Jewish people had no power in Germany. So he took away all the Jewish people right to make a living e.g. closed Jewish shops, geneies, businesses and so forthOne-year later Hitler prejudice against the Jew was clearly showing as Susanne explains she knew that the Jew was existence treated differently to other. Running into Nazis marching was precise(prenominal) uncomtable for her, as she had no chicaneledge of what they would do to her, if they saw her and knew she was a Jew. As a issuance for her fear of Hitler and the Nazis, she moved to Italy. However she didnt settle in Italy as her mother found work in London.Susanne expectation of London was very different to what she got. As she thought that London was rainy and misty all over, as she knew approximately this from text moxie in Germany. She also that London was a place of lords and ladies.When arriving in London Susanne thought London was very exciting place. Bringing only her most valued possessions, her and her family was guaranteed a house, clothes, sustenance and an education. Susanne and her mother stay with a Jewish family who her mum worked for as a housekeeper. Which was not to Susanne family expectation, however as her mum had very little reason of English she had no other choice but to take up that excerpt.Shortly afterward there was speculation of Germany bombing London. Which meant school and all children was to be evacuated from London and interpreted to Somerset. After staying in Somerset for a while Susanne returned to London, and got an apprenticeship with a photography studio before war took place. purport for Susanne wasnt going to well as she had to leave the studio as a result of lack of war workers and which was visit as supererogatory at war. However she was able to find employment in s everal(prenominal) places but they were temporary.To underpin our researches and interviews, we visit Deptford High Street to see if all the information we have collected so far is correct. And our so I objective is proved, as Deptford is a multi-cultural companionship. There ar many different races Chinese, White, Black-Caribbean, Asian etc. I also found out that there was a collection between the ethnic make-up, to the different ethnic shops (businesses) in Deptford. For example, there were Chinese and Indian restaurants and take away, Black-Caribbean and Asian vegetable stores.I picked up leaflets from the Albany Center as some proved of my visit to Deptford. whole these leaflets show different activities from different ethnic group, which ar available to the public. A typical example is a theater show show and dance staged at the Calabash Day Center, this performance is mainly aim at the black community. Another leaflet is picked publicize Chinese and Arabic Saturday cla sses.All this information show is how Deptford has be watch over a multi-cultural community as different people have settle in. wherefore have people migrated to London? concord to sources A and B (factual texts) many people migrated to Britain because after the war so much British men and women were killed that there wasnt enough people to rebuild Britain. So in 1948 the Britain government passed a Nationality Act allowing all colonial and domain citizens to nonplus a British citizen. Which meant the Britain government can bring people for population country over to Britain, to rebuild the kingdomscapes. However for the majority of the people who has come over to Britain they were feed inn the dirty and the unpopular jobs, as they were not ameliorate enough for the higher-class jobs e.g. designer, lawyer, pilot etc. In order for these people of a lower living standard to come to Britain the British government had to give out loan to them, which had to be pay back once they g ot settle in.Source C is a picture of Black-Caribbean people entering Britain by boat, which was produce in a paper. The people who atomic number 18 shown are very brisknessly dressed with winter uniform and equipment. The why reason why this particle picture was publish was to attend to change the British people point of views of Black people in general. This picture also published to show that Black were very independent working people, by their smart looks and are quite civilized people as their appearance were very similar to the British people dress sense they are but equivalent us.Source A2 is a extract for a history book, which is ascertain not to be a very utile piece of indorse as is has no person-to-person account and the we dont know who has written this text. However this text does contain factual information, and I support alot of researches has been done before the text was written. However this text lacks a very important aspect which is, who wrote this pa rticle piece of text? Which I entrust is the most important aspect when a piece of text is employ as evidence.Source C2 is a photograph showing some migrants arriving in Britain by boat. When it can to deciding if this photograph is useful as a piece of evidence. I consider it also not to be very useful as I swear the person who have taken this particle photograph was a white person. Which meant s/he could have taken and published this photograph because of personal and for pacify reasons. For example they treasured to change the British opinion of Black-Caribbean people.Another reason why this photograph is not a useful piece of evidence is that I remember this photograph could have easily been rearranged or fixed to fit the government, and how they precious the British people to see Black-Caribbean people. I have reason to believe in this because as we all know the Caribbean is consider to a very hot place to live all around the year. Which mean its very usual to see Black -C aribbean people with winter clothing and equipment.Source D2 is an oral interview with Suzanne Samson, who is a refugee from Germany. I consider this source as being the most useful piece of evidence out of the three. This because this source is factual and personal which is most likely to be the true. horizontal through is can be make up, over exaggerated, or the person cant remember everything, as its a child account.Sources E2 and F2 are two phase of why Somali have settle in Britain. The reason for Somali settlement has changed form the 1945 to the 1980s, as Somalias first settled in London to seek better employment and to make enough money so they can retire back to Somali. When arriving in London they settled in the London East End, to a sailor community, as they were poor and uneducated. The second reason why Somali settled in Britain was to run from Said Barres Regime who was the one-ninth dictator. However these people tended to be richer and educated e.g. doctorsPeople h ave migrated to London for many different reasons. The majority of these reasons are considers as the result of a push or pull. The push factor is when a person is force out of their country e.g. wars, health, environment etc.The pull factor is what attracted a person to over e.g. employment in 1948, the British Nationality Act was passed to allow people in the commonwealth to come into British, allow them to become a British citizens. However the most common reason why people migrate to Britain is for a better education.The feel of migrants in London.According to source A3 and B3 (two personal account), the people expectation of Britain- London was very different from what they got. As these people expected Britain to be the Golden land, the land of probability and hope. However Britain was nothing to their expectation, the houses all capped together and no spaces.Sources C3, D3 and E3 are all particle part from different newspaper article. All these sources show us that the typ e of prejudice that Black and food colour people had to face was racism. For example, White and Black pubs and jobs were separated. However the majority of the While community would have the better choices from jobs, pubs, lifestyle etc.Source F3 is a sketch which show a While person stabbing a Colour person, and in the background there is a Nazis and the cartoon contain an get a line of people being hanged. This cartoon is making a equivalence of Germany- Nazis and the racial activities which take place in Britain e.g. racial attack. The cartoonist has made a comparison between Hitler and the Nazis with the racial activities which take place in Britain, as Hitler and the Nazis were a very racial group as they killed thousand of Jewish people, where with Britain there are many small racist attacks everyday.This source (F3) is quite useful as an historian text as it shows that racism does exist in Britain, even though its a one sided view of the polices reception to racism attac k in Britain. However its not very clear when it come down to telling factual information approximately the incident and is over exaggerated e.g. there is no hanging. This cartoon also shows us that people like the cartoonists are seriously worried with the violence.Source E3 is an article published in a newspaper, which consist of five personal accounts of five different men living the southmosteast of London.In these account of people living in South-East London, Mr. Roger (While) believe there is a over glowing amount of Black people which is partly why he dislike his landing field. He also believe Black people pack them into houses, however he believe his Black neighbours are very friendly.Where with Mr. Barring (Black) who believe the South-East is a place of many close and a place of little racial discrimination, I have never come into contact with a colour prejudice and I like it hereHowever Mr. Fitz (Black), who has lived in the South-East for 12 years comparison to Mr. Barring who has lived in the South-East five years, believe the neignours are the corresponding the world over, sometime good and sometime bad. He also believes there is racial discrimination in his community. For example, employees think youre less able because of your colour.Mr. Frankin (Black) also spares a similar opinion to Mr. Fite, as he believes his neighbours are quite friendly. However his has come into contact with racial prejudice in the past.The final account is from Mr. Charle (White) who believes the Black workers are a very ingenious crowd, but a nuisance when they make a noise. He also believe he is not prejudiced against them but he preferably they were not here.All these accounts are quite useful and reliable, as the majority of these accounts are factual about personal experience of racial discrimination. For example, 2 out of 3 of these colour people accounts show that they have seen and experience some racial discrimination in the past, I do come into conta ct with racial prejudice. This sign of racial is supported by Mr. Charle account (White) who would rather they (Black people) were not here. This account show us that Mr. Charle is prejudiced to Black workers, but doesnt except that he is prejudiced, I am not prejudiced against them (Black people). However these are personal accounts and do not represent London as a whole. The aim of the newspaper in publishing these account is to promote good race dealingsIn order to write a complete and reliable account of the experience in migrating into London between 1945-1997 I could studied many other sources. For example I can studied a personal account of someone who has just move to London, to see if theyre similar to all the other personal accounts I have studies. I can also do and studied a simple questionnaire, which could be utilise to support these personal accounts by comparing them.How have migrants affected the area?Migration has affected the area of London and Deptford in many w ays. As more than and more people have come into London, they have brought with them their traditions and culture, which over time has been accepted, into British society. These traditions are widely practised all over the Britain.Source A4 shows an account by Minette Bailey of what she thought of London, when she first came from Jamaica. She thought that the British people were hypocrites. She said that It is very unsung to see how many people smokestack into church on Sundays instead of going to worship God. It is very strange how many English missionaries come to the West Indies to teach us about God.This was the feeling many black people had, so they decided to manifest Black-led churches, so their traditions could be maintained. This had been acknowledged by many people and also welcomed. In 1982, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Robert Runcie said the presence of the ethnic groups with their different religious traditions has devoted new breadth and generosity to our vision of the brotherhood of man and the male parent of God. The idea was welcomed and even praised by many people.Source B4 shows some untried Vietnamese men practising a dance for the Chinese New course, which was to be performed at the Chinese community school, South London in 1987. Source C4 shows a Somali boarding house, in Leman Street in the 1950s. Source E4 shows a Mosque in London. This building was first used as a Church, then as a Synagogue, then as a church again and finally as a Mosque. You can see when the inhabitants of the area change how the area changes as well. The inhabitants of Brick Lane now are mainly Bangladeshi and other Muslims. You see this from the different languages on the sign.Source D4 shows a number of councillors in the London region. Five of the six are Black Les Eytle, Eddie Capone, Solomon Brown, Angelina Simpson and Stephen Padmore. The last person, Claude Gonsalves is South American. This change was needed as not many English councillors in the pas t did things that benefited the other ethnic groups. These people have become part of the government to make sure that everybody got what was exceed for them.During our visit to Deptford High Street we could see that Deptford is a multi-cultural community. There are many different races Black ? Afro-Caribbean, White, Chinese, Asian etc. I also found out that there were many different shops owned by different kinds of people like Indian and Chinese restaurants, Afro-Caribbean and Asian grocers, proper butchers etc. I found that there many different kinds of goods available, most of which are imported from foreign countries, such as mangoes, oranges, lychees, yams etc. in spite of appearance the area of Deptford, there is a Chinese health centre. Over the years all kinds people have started to use this shop to get vivid herbs and medicine, rather than going to the chemist for conventional medicine. The Sainsburys store in the area uses a number of languages to label the goods, so i t could be still by everyone in the community.I also picked up a number of leaflets from the Albany Centre. A typical example is a have it off concert performed at the Barbican Centre this is really aimed at the Black community. Another leaflet I picked up promoted the show and dance staged at the Calabash Day Centre again it is aimed at the Black community. There was another leaflet promoting Saturday classes, such as Arabic and Chinese. All this information shows how Deptford has become a multi-cultural community as different people have settled in.Over fifties years foreigner and commonwealth country started approach in Britain in abundant amounts, until was introduced. This meant Britain would only take in a reasonable amount of people a year. In other occasion Britain also take refugees of war, such as when Asians were exiled from South Africa.Which leave me with the conclusion that if war never happened, Britain would still be a country with a high population as foreigners has been coming in to Britain for the last fifties years. Therefore there will not be as many job opportunities, so no foreigners would be attracted into coming to Britain.However as war did happened for Britain foreigners working in the country would have felt very uncomtable working those condition, leaving them with very little option but to do war works or leave the country to find work where else.Since after the Second World War (1945) till now (1999) great changes has taken place for many reason in term of the population and the ethnic groups, and for different reason e.g. a great population with various number of ethnic group. Some of these changes are consider being the result of what we would call the push and pull factors. For example in 1946, The European volunteer workers scheme involve people from all over Europe in rebuilding London. An interpretation show that this as an prospect for many people to rebuild their lives. This quotation is also showing that this is an opportunity for the unemployed people, as there will be thousand of jobs on offers.