Museum Of Modern Art George Seurat

Art AS communication 3 December 2013 Museum opus On November 9th, 2013, St. Josephs College hosted a field of force trip into New York City. The purpose of this field trip was to transport us into the city, and have the students visit a major fraud museum. There were a few different choices, the students had, only if nigh went straight to the Metropolitan Museum of Art because the admission to the museum was whatever you want to contribute. However, we took a different approach.My friend and I went straight to The Museum of Modern Art, also cognize as the MOMA. I looked draftly the night before at separately museum to get a feel for what I treasured to see, and what I did not. one time I motto this artist was at the MOMA, thats when I knew I wanted to actually see it in person. The artist that I very(prenominal) a good deal wanted to see was George Seurat. Prior to this associate, I have never hear of this artist. I never knew who he was, or knew the style in which he painted. It was only a few classes before the trip that I really learned to appreciate this artist.I have never seen an artist who has the patience and frangibility to place these dots on a canvas, slightlytimes smaller than a crumb, to bring in a work of art. George Seurat was a French Post-Impressionist painter who drew in a style called pointillism. Pointillism is the theory or practice in art of applying small strokes or dots of colourise to a surface so that from a distance they blend together. (Merriam- webster. com) This style of painting is consistent with his opposite whole caboodle through this time period. The piece of art I chose for my paper is the Port-en-Bessin, get to he Harbor by Seurat.This painting was made in France in 1888 and is roughly 21. 65 inches by 25. 59 inches. The painting is oil on canvas and describes a throw in France. When I first saw this painting I didnt realize it was a piece by Seurat. It looked as if it was work done in a different sty le than pointillism. I chose this one because, in my opinion, this style of painting deserves the most respect egress of any of the artist. In this painting you can see how each small-minded dot is done in order to create one biggish image. The first thing I noticed in this painting was the specify line between the shore and the water.Seurat uses different shades of green and a very pale color to illustrate the effect of grass and sand. For some reason that part of the painting kept me looking for a microscopic bit and following the shore line up the painting. Next my look brought me to the water and the floating dock towards the middle ground slightly to the left over(p) of the painting. Here you can see he used two completing colors to really attract your eye to that point. The almost wood color f the dock and the light blue water really fortify each other and keep you looking there for a brief second.The water had me confused at first. You can see within the harbor itsel f, there be three larger dark blue circles. I thought they were deeper parts of the water and Seurat was trying to create depth here, but I soon ruled that out. I later realized with the stick out that is portrayed here, that those be clouds exiting the harbor and that there was a lot way out on here. I believe this is where Seurat wanted his focal point to be. The very center of the painting shows the sharp angles of the sails against the dark shadow of the cloud opposition the water.It is not just the contrast that brings your eyes here, but it is the way the boats are positioned. As with the shore line mentioned earlier, the boats are creating this line in which your eyes Just follow. Seurat uses directional force here starting with the boat on the right and creating this sense of movement towards the boat to the left, leading out into the ocean. He uses the shapes of the sails, and the direction they re advancing, to lead your eyes out, to the background, into the ocean whe re the rest of the boats are.Actually sack into the city to see the original work in person was measurable to me because you can only appreciate this style of art once you are in front of it. Looking up this picture online doesnt do it nicety because the colors are get through and it looks strikingly different from the original. Also an fundamental thing to note is you can really see the small and fair dots he used in this painting. When you zoom in online, the resolution is off and it gets blurry before you can see detail.Not to discredit any other artist, but I think this style of painting requires much to a greater extent time and dedication to create the final image. Overall, I have enjoyed this trip, and the class for that matter, because it showed me there is more to art when you can break it down utilise the elements and principles and see what the painting is really about. Works Cited Pointillism Definition and More from the stop Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Diction ary and Thesaurus Merriam-Webster Online. N. p. , 7 Aug. 2012. Web. 29 NOV. 2013. .